Author Details :
Volume : 6, Issue : 3, Year : 2021
Article Page : 157-160
Background: Bleeding on probing (BOP) is the best documented parameter in the monitoring of periodontal health and in?ammation of the gingival tissues. It is measured as bleeding provoked by applying a probe to the bottom of a sulcus/pocket. Since BoP may be provoked by trauma to the tissues using a periodontal probe hence, probing pressure can be considered as an important factor in the assessment of bleeding on probing.
Aim: The purpose of the study was to evaluate bleeding on probing by conventional probe and pressure sensitive probe.
Materials and Methods : 50 subjects (1400 sites) in this split mouth study were evaluated for bleeding on probing by using a conventional periodontal probe and a manual pressure sensitive probe. Gingival Bleeding Index (Ainamo and Bay 1975) was used in the study for assessment of BOP.
Result : More bleeding sites were found in the quadrant associated with the conventional probe as compared to the sites associated with pressure sensitive probe.
Conclusion : Amount of pressure applied during probing can be a significant factor in assessment the periodontal disease activity.
Keywords: Bleeding on probing, UNC15 probe, TPS probe
How to cite : Tripathi P, Puri K, Kumar A, Khatri M, Bansal M, Rehan M, Comparison of two different probing systems for evaluation of bleeding on probing (BOP). IP Int J Periodontol Implantol 2021;6(3):157-160
Copyright © 2021 by author(s) and IP Int J Periodontol Implantol. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)
PDF Downloaded: 14